What is the Food Media Reckoning?

Reporting, essays, and criticism about the holes that still exist in food media — and what its future could look like when we look to its past. 

Get The Objective in your inbox every week.

This is the editor’s note from our series “The Reckoning in Food Media” — a collection of reporting, essays, and criticism about the holes that still exist in food media — and what its future could look like when we look to its past. Read more here.

In summer of 2020, mainstream media organizations coast to coast — from the Los Angeles to the New York Times — publicly, and messily, grappled with their histories of harm, systemic racism and pay discrimination. 

Food media wasn’t exempt. Once a photo of former editor-in-chief Adam Rapaport in brownface was surfaced on Twitter by former staff, Conde Nast’s Bon Appétit Magazine leapt from the fire to the frying pan: A stream of BA Test Kitchen chefs, starting with Sohla El-Waylly, called out Test Kitchen’s pay discrimination between chefs of color and white chefs, and promptly left the organization. 

But a “reckoning” doesn’t make systemic change. Food writers like Soleil Ho and Dan Q. Dao highlighted that food media’s systemic whiteness isn’t just about its staff, but about the recipes and chefs it celebrates. 

Three years after food media institutions pledged to do better, The Objective, in partnership with L.A. Taco, is publishing The Reckoning in Food Media, a collection of reporting, essays, and criticism about the holes that still exist in food media — and what its future could look like when we look to its past. 

Gaps in coverage still exist, from uncritical celebration of “farm-to-table” ethos, to a Eurocentric recipe focus, to social media’s impact on the food landscape in cities. This issue’s pieces ask: Who’s making food media? What’s missing? What broader conversations should be about who makes our food and who gets to eat well? 

Dig in. And let us know what you think.

We depend on your donation. Yes, you...

With your small-dollar donation, we pay our writers, our fact checkers, our insurance broker, our web host, and a ton of other services we need to keep the lights on.

But we need your help. We can’t pay our writers what we believe their stories should be worth and we can’t afford to pay ourselves a full-time salary. Not because we don’t want to, but because we still need a lot more support to turn The Objective into a sustainable newsroom.

We don’t want to rely on advertising to make our stories happen — we want our work to be driven by readers like you validating the stories we publish are worth the effort we spend on them.

Consider supporting our work with a tax-deductable donation.

James Salanga,

Editorial Director